국제법 판례 · 통상법 해설 포털

4. (최원엽) Legal Impediments to the Exercise of WTO Jurisdiction in light of Mexico -Soft Drinks (DS308) and Peru-Agricultural Products (DS457) 본문

4. (최원엽) Legal Impediments to the Exercise of WTO Jurisdiction in light of Mexico -Soft Drinks (DS308) and Peru-Agricultural Products (DS457)

통상법무정책/2022년 제2호 2023. 1. 13. 10:28

(최원엽) Legal Impediments to the Exercise of WTO Jurisdiction in light of Mexico -Soft Drinks (DS308) and Peru-Agricultural Products (DS457).pdf
0.55MB

 

* 아래 본문은 원문과 문단 구분 등이 다를 수 있습니다. 정확한 원문을 확인하시고 싶으신 분은 위 파일을 다운로드하시기 바랍니다.

 

[Abstract]

 

Overlap or conflict of jurisdictions in dispute settlement may be defined as situations where the same dispute or related aspects of the same dispute could be brought to two distinct institutions or two different dispute settlement systems for a solution. As the number of different international regimes and tribunals has multiplied over the past years, overlaps of jurisdictions have become commonplace in the international arena. This phenomenon is part of the fragmentation of international law, which is a result of the rise of specialized regimes that have different interests and biases.   


Since the World Trade Organization (WTO) recognizes the right of Members to enter into Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs), an inherent tension exists between Members’ rights under their RTAs and their rights under the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU). However, there are a limited number of cases in which clear judgments have been made on the conflicting jurisdiction between the WTO and RTAs. Until now, WTO adjudicators have been reluctant to unequivocally state “whether there may be other circumstances in which legal impediments could exist that would preclude a panel from ruling on the merits before it”. This paper considers what potential legal impediments to the exercise of WTO jurisdiction exist if a party raises the question of a WTO panel’s jurisdiction as a preliminary issue, with a specific focus on two WTO dispute settlement cases – Mexico-Soft Drinks (DS308) and Peru-Agricultural Products (DS457). 


Keywords : jurisdiction, WTO dispute settlement, RTAs, forum selection, mutually agreed solution, legal impediments, Mexico-Soft Drinks (DS308), Peru-Agricultural Products (DS457) 

 


 

본 저작물 사용 시 저작물의 출처를 표시하셔야 하며,
상업적인 이용 및 변경은 금지됩니다. 위 조건을 위반할 경우 저작권 침해가
성립되므로 형사상, 민사상 책임을 부담 하실 수 있습니다.
상세한 안내는 링크 참조하시기 바랍니다.

https://www.kogl.or.kr/info/license.do#04-tab


 

Comments